List Price : $117.00Price : $114.99 as of 2012-11-05 11:15 PM
Product Description
If you thought the FuzziBunz One Size Diaper could not get any better think again. FuzziBunz has re-engineered their already popular One Size to be trimmer fitting, more comfortable, faster drying and easier to adjust than before. Some of the features are: quick dry fleece, baby feels dryer faster and fleece stays nice longer. Easy-replace elastic are all internal no buttons next to baby's skin. Minky inserts: 2 minky inserts adding less odor than microfiber, less staining and trimmer fitting diaper with the same amount of absorbency. Streamlined front panel and snap design provides better fit with less leaking.
Most economical cloth diapering choice since diaper fits baby from birth to potty training
Stuff and go convenience the pocket design allows you to customize the absorbency based on baby's needs
Includes outer pocket shell, two inserts, and set of easy replace elastic
List Price : Price : $88.38 as of 2012-09-27 11:03 AM
Product Description
EC-70-F - 4-Year-Old Children's Torso Form - Fleshtone (white is shown)Has a concealed 5/8" flange for use with stand. Snap-on painted wooden base included.
A dark ominous cloud of judicial impropriety looms over the U.S.Federal court system.The darkest of this precipitous cloud formation is that which hangs over the Central District of California, in the wake of U.S.District Judge David O.Carter's provocative decision to dismiss the case of "Keyes v.Obama," which a firm majority of the informed and concerned American electorate considered vital to a determination of whether Barack H.Obama, alias Barry Soetoro, is constitutionally eligible to continue as President of the United States.I wonder what actually went on in the mind of the 64 year old federal judge, appointed by Bill Clinton in 1998, after he had firmly stated, in early November of this year, that pursuing the case was vitally important to a constitutional determination of Obama's basic eligibility as a natural born citizen of the United States, that is, whether he was actually born in the State of Hawaii or in Mombasa, Kenya, Africa.As a former U.S.Marine Corps combat officer in Vietnam, Carter has a history of being a stand-up jurist, and his statement, that "soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors sent into harm's way in Iraq and Afghanistan need to be assured that the President ordering them into combat is eligible to hold that office and issue those orders," conveyed a poignant need to adjudicate the issues of "Keyes v.Obama" in a speedy and judicially responsible manner.Then came the U.S.Department of Justice intervening improperly, in a totally non-governmental capacity, for Obama, using U.S.Tax dollars to petition Judge Carter to dismiss the lawsuit, in the same fashion that eight of Carter's judicial colleagues had done since shortly after Obama's nomination in 2008, just after the first federal lawsuit was filed against the man.I wonder what Judge Carter was thinking as he was being intimidated by USDOJ attorneys, who challenged the judge's authority and jurisdiction to decide whether Obama was culpable of duplicity and fraud, and whether the dubious President should step down as the U.S.Chief executive if found culpable.This was, of course, only after Carter had ruled that a trial on the merits of the case would commence in January 2010; but even then, Carter had refused to dismiss the lawsuit, and many Americans believed that he would proceed with the trial.Yet, Carter declared a dismissal, and after extensive research into the subsequent course of events, I have found it reasonable to suspect that Judge Carter was very probably the unfortunate recipient of some threatening, well-worded telephone calls, and e-mails from deceitful politicians who desperately wanted to see the case dismissed.What is that you say, that this is pure speculation?Well, let's get down to basic reality, sad history repeats itself frequently; for such politically contrived corruption has been quite common in the course of 20th Century American government; and bad things have frequently happened to good people, by artifice, who have attempted at their own risk to ensure that justice prevailed.Just within the past five years, Stanley R.Hilton, a preeminent scholar and noted attorney in San Francisco, represented over a hundred 9/11 victims' families in a lawsuit he filed against George W.Bush, Dick Cheney, and others of the Bush administration, for complicity and direct involvement in the 9/11 bombings of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, U.S.District Judge Susan Illston, of San Francisco, ordered Hilton to drop the lawsuit, which he refused to do.Subsequently, thereafter, began a number of stealthy burglaries into Hilton's San Francisco law offices resulting in the theft and destruction of vital material evidence linking Bush, Cheney, and others to the 9/11 attacks.Finally, when Illston couldn't get Hilton to drop the lawsuit, she curtly dismissed the case on grounds of "sovereign immunity," essentially declaring that a President can do anything during his time in office, even commit mass murder, and do it will civil and criminal impunity.More distantly, the lengths that corrupt politicians will go to ensure that their wily stratagems are implemented have been well documented.When a U.S.Navy commander with a heavy conscience came forward, in February 1968, to testify before a Senate Foreign Relations Committe hearing that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was not what it was originally reported by the Pentagon, in order to warrant the massive escallation of ground troops in Vietnam in 1965, Senator J.William Fulbright discovered that the honest naval officer was "picked up by heavy-handed CIA intelligence operatives under White House order and committed involuntarily to a psychiatric ward for several weeks.".Perhaps Judge David O.Carter, with his brilliant Rhodes Scholar-level mind, seriously considered Susan Illston's horrendous precedental ruling, and, perhaps, the perceived intimidations from the DOJ and regarded them as potentially ominous.As a matter of historical record, there were, also, quite a few German judges, mentioned in my earlier Ezine essay, who, during the years leading up to the disastrous dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, either stepped down from their judicial positions or abandoned their judicial ethics and joined the Nazi Party, when they were told by the SS and the Gestapo that the formerly adored Weimar Constitution was no longer law, and that Nazi law reigned supreme.Actually, there were more than a few of the German judges who chose to side with the Nazis, at the threat of death.Yet, there is another salient matter to consider in this quasi-legal fray.All American trial judges, federal and state, worry about their rulings being eventually overturned, on a basis of law, by appellate courts.When mistakes based entirely upon law are, supposedly, made by trial judges, the appellate courts are there to rightfully remand the cases back to the trial court for a correction of the errors.Nonetheless, Judge Carter probably realized the contrived political machinations surrounding "Keyes v.Obama," and that a ruling by him ordering Barack Obama to produce his original Hawaiian birth certificate, and the other undisclosed records sought by the plaintiff's attorney, even if correct, would be automatically reversed on a totally political basis by a federal appeals court.Though the facts and merits of the plaintiff's case might have clearly shown that Barack H.Obama fraudulently acted in a deliberate fashion to conceal the truth about his birth, by spending approximately 1.5 million dollars in legal expenses to keep from producing a 12 dollar certified copy of his original long-form birth certificate, the case would never have been allowed to proceed to trial.Whatever the actual cause for the unfortunate dismissal, whether Judge David O.Carter was concerned about the perceived threats, or merely realized the absolute futility of proceeding to trial on the merits of the case, another example of a President (this time dubiously elected) being above the law has emerged.When I think of the great John Adams, lawyer, patriot, and the second American President, saying before the Massachusetts Assembly that the United States is a nation of laws, and not of men, I am utterly indignant at the appalling Machiavellian politicization of basic justice now prevalent in the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of the federal government.It would seem that the American republic is no longer, in form and substance, what it was a decade-or-more before the turn of the 20th Century; and that this nation, which was once a great constitutional republic, might sadly be at a point of no return from a mutated form of government destructive to the ends espoused in the Constitution of the United States.
When you have kids, there are no easy trips to the store or quick errands to run.Children need to be buckled into the car and unbuckled out of the car and that is before you even get into the store! If you child is like most, they are tempted by candy and toys, and the risk of a fit being thrown is real every time you leave the house.Alternatively, your child tends to fall asleep in the car, and you do not want to wake them.It is no wonder that some parents think, "I'll just run in really fast, and leave the kids in the car.It will only take a minute".But unfortunately, that is where the real problem lies.Every year kids die from being left unattended inside cars.The reality is that is only takes a couple of minutes for something to go terribly wrong.Whether your child is a baby, or old enough to buckle and unbuckle themselves, the danger of leaving a child in a car is real.The risk of leaving a child in the car range from overheating, to the child figuring out a way to escape the car, to kidnapping.Some parents think their child will be fine if they leave the car running, and that is simply not true.Children find a way to escape car seats everyday, and with the car running, there are too many ways for the child to get hurt or cause the car to start moving.It is never OK to knowingly leave a child unattended in the car.There are times when a parent can simply forget the child is with them, especially if the child is sleeping.There are steps that parents can take to remind themselves to check the backseat.One way is to train yourself to put your purse in the back seat.This simple step will get you into the habit of checking the back seat.In addition, there are products available to serve a reminder to check for baby, such as decals, clings and key chains.If you are a parent of a child and dreading the next trip to the store, just remember this.Kids have been throwing fits in the store for as long as anyone can remember.When your child is throwing a fit, or screaming and crying in the store, there is not a person in that store that would rather you endanger your child by leaving them in the car.If you spot an unattended child left in a car, contact the store manager or security so the parent can be located immediately.
Mix and match made easy. Now you can build baby's wardrobe with our Grey and White 3 Piece Boys Cardigan Set by Carter's - 3 months. The set includes a short sleeve bodysuit, matching pants and long sleeve, hooded cardigan. With its expandable shoulders, reinforced bottom snaps for easy changes and silky soft 100% cotton throughout, its no wonder CarterÕs is AmericaÕs first choice in baby layette. Care instructions: machine wash, tumble dry. Will not shrink or fade.
There is a great need for value-price apparel.Although some of us would love to be able to spend oodles of money on clothing, it's not very practical for most.Some people live paycheck to paycheck and need to be able to buy reasonably-priced clothes to wear.Not only should there be value-priced clothing for women, there should also be some for teen girls as well.We need inexpensive clothes to be available for both genders, as people need to get good clothes at good prices.The clothing that is less expensive than other clothing shouldn't be tacky looking just because it's cheaper.The clothing needs to look nice for those people who need to work in a general office, real estate office, or other such field.No one should have to dress tacky just because they can't afford to buy more expensive clothing.Yes, it's true that some shops already offer value-priced apparel.Unfortunately, their idea of value is to reduce an outfit from $300 down to $200, a price still beyond most of us for everyday wear.Inexpensive clothing needs to become more of a widespread thing.In the future, more and more people are going to want to purchase their clothing at a more reasonable rate.There's absolutely no reason that some clothing has to be so pathetically expensive.No company should be able to overcharge by a ridiculous sum of money for everyday clothing.The price of clothing should decrease, not increase.The world needs more clothing designers that have the willingness to offer their beautiful clothing at beautiful prices.Not every clothing designer needs to be as greedy with money as some tend to be.Many of them on purposely overcharge people for the clothing just to make a lot more money for themselves.In reality, they might sell more clothing if they made it fall under the category of value-priced apparel.People do like designer looks when it comes to apparel, but they don't want to spend a whole paycheck on one shirt or dress.Most people need options when it comes to clothing - they need to buy clothing that fits within their budget.Some people have budgets that are much lower than others.Do these people not deserve to wear very nice looking clothes? Everyone deserves to wear clothing that looks tremendously beautiful on them, and they deserve to get it at a price that fits within their spending budget.That was really a simple and reasonable statement to make, and it's absolutely the truth.Discount retailers seem to have figured out this market, and have managed to place a good deal of clothing online.Particularly considering that you save gas shopping online, this adds to the cost savings of buying value-priced clothing on the internet.
